Bike-Burgh
http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2008/05/pittsburgh-spro.html
Burghonomics and other musings
2001 8,182
2002 8,224
2003 8,297
2004 8,275
2005 8,240
2006 8,181
2007 8,019
2008 7,938
2009 7,835
2010 7,712
“Pittsburgh’s a winner,” Funkhouser said. “We’re not close to Pittsburgh. It’s got a vibrant street life.“It’s what I hope we’ll be like.”Not quite sure how to reconcile that statement with Funkhousers strong opposition to TIFs. If there is a place that has used a lot of TIFs its been the City of Pittsburgh through the 1990s and early 2000s. Maybe there is no connection, but it does deserve some study.
In the NYT today with a dateline of Pittsburgh of course: As Deaths Outpace Births, Cities Adjust, by Sam Roberts and Sean D. Hamill.
But looking forward is a different type of story. Here is a graphic I sometimes point out to folks. From where we are at already and projecting out, there are places that are expecting to see some really phenomenal increases in their elderly populations. By state the projected percentage increase in the elderly (age 65+) population between 2000 and 2030 by state looks like this.
And if I were put the Pittsburgh region into that graph, it would come in a full third lower than Pennsylvania overall depending on what you are defining as the region.
What does that mean? LIBOR +10% puts you at around 16% these days which is pretty unfavorable as these things go and remarkable when you go back and look at some of the early financial analysis of a casino license in Pittsburgh. This one assumed a cost of capital in the range of 6-10% and by 10% the profitability was getting pretty shaky. At 16%, there must be an implict assumption on Barden's part that he will refinance lower as soon as the prospects for a profitable operation are a little more secure. It may be a bit boring for many, but given how big a deal this all is in town, you would think there would be story just in these interest rates he is being forced to offer to get his financing. That's a huge issue all around even if he gets all the funding he is looking for.The $370 million first-lien term loan for casino operator PITG Gaming was oversubscribed Monday after the discount was lowered to 94 cents on the dollar from an original issue discount of 96. The company's $250 million second-lien term loan was flexed to 92 from an OID of 96; but the tranche was only half subscribed by last Tuesday and having difficulty attracting investors, a portfolio manager looking at the deal said.
lead arranger Credit Suisse launched the first lien and second lien, along with a $100 million revolver, April 18. Pricing on the first lien was initially LIBOR plus 6% with a LIBOR floor of 3.25%. The second lien was priced at LIBOR plus 10% with the same floor. The loans are non-call for 18 months, after which there is hard-call protection of 102, 101. The financing backs the construction of the Majestic Star Casino in Pittsburgh, Pa. Jon Bennett, cfo and treasurer, did not return calls.