To asphalt or not to asphalt
Consider that the original Act 47 Plan required the City to sell it’s asphalt plant. (page 151, page 163 per the pdf numbering). Now the new Act 47 (page 210, page 219 per the pdf numbering) plan being debated (for lack of a better verb) says the city should “fully analyze the costs and benefits associated with a new asphalt plant”.
Semantics, but would you ever want to less-than-fully analyze something like that. Makes you wonder where else the costs and benefits were not 'fully' analyzed in the first Act 47 plan.