Water Water Everywhere
Lots of other strange things related to the water authority of late. Before Kenney resigned, there was the odd episode last week where he said he couldn't answer whether Pittsburgh Brewing had paid its water bill. This was a big story and was a big $$ amount owed to the PWSA. You would think he would have some idea the status. Curious at best. It also relates to another story some may have caught that former Pittsburgh Brewing owner Michael Carlow, is getting back into business and this time it's in the slag business. Yes, slag. There just has to be a joke in that. He ran up a big PWSA bill as well along the way I do believe. Water... beer... slag... bankruptcy.. perfect together?
Last month there was the recurrent bruhaha over the legacy payments made by the PWSA to equalize billing to the parts of Pittsburgh. Make note of the water breaks above. I hate to say this, and am a PWSA rate payer myself, but there is a simple answer to the whole American Water payment debate that keeps recurring. Raise PWSA rates to the private sector rates set for the southern and western neighborhoods benefiting from the subsidy. There is more than enough justification to spend any excess revenue into capital investments. Remember this is an agency that fully acknowledges it can't account for 40% of the water flowing through its system. I suspect that if anyone could put numbers on it, the city of Pittsburgh has the oldest working water infrastructure in the nation. I've heard of a few places in New England that still have working timber piping, but other than that we really must take the prize. For a place that claims water is a huge competitive advantage, there is this little problem of getting the water to where it is actually used and taking it away afterwards.
What I just noticed reading the rate increase story is that one of the reasons given by the PWSA is that it was necessitated by, among other things, increasing credit costs. Thing about that is most interest rates are historically low these days. Raises some interesting questions why their credit costs are up. Are they referring to their costs in the past resulting from the nearly disasterous variable rate debt they had entered into. Remember, that was the debt that became insanely expensive when our friend JP Morgan unilaterally walked away from the credit backing the variable rate debt required. Some huge irony in that some think JP Morgan is the city's saviour with the parking bid while at the same time would have been responsible for the collapse of the water authority if they had not been able to find someone to take their place. It was far from a sure thing. It cost the PWSA dearly to get through. Why would they act so benevolently in one case, and the opposite in the other? There will be many issues of contention over the course of a 50 year lease and you want to have some trust in your counterparty.
Which leads us to more questions. Since the PWSA claims to have stabilized the variable rate debt problem with a new letter of credit.... then again why the increasing cost of credit? May not have anything to do with anything, but still worth noticing by someone is that the credit rating on that letter of credit was downgraded a couple months ago. Not just put on credit watch negative, actually downgraded. You just have to wonder what else is in play here.
and remember... think these are all city problems, and only city problems. PWSA problems are the region's problems.