So I harshed on the Trib story on Braddock yesterday. Coincidence a bit, but I just was checking this PG story from earlier this month on the general topic of Mon Valley real estate
and the semi-obligatory focus on Braddock. I was starting to look at the first inset graphic where it gives the notional taxes on a $100K property in Braddock and thinking that was just a silly benchmark for a place that likely has no $100K residential properties... and if it does, it clearly won't after the reassessment gets completed. Knock on wood. (hey was there a status conference last week?)
But at the bottom a graphic they have this summary of data for each municpality. How bad are things in Duquesne.. or how forgotten is it? What is missing in their list? The data is there, but nobody at all noticed something was missing from only the 2nd blurb of data. I'm pretty sure the list was alphabetical. It's a metaphor unto itself.